Ghostbusters (2016) UHD Blu-ray Review (2024)

Argumentative

Overcompensating and certainly curious, Paul Fieg resets Ghostbusters’ lore with only a fizzling pop rather than a bang. A few moments work – particularly some of the action which features plenty of pizazz – but anything in-between lumbers and chokes on the writing. Political pandering led into the release and curiously, featured into it. Now months later, no one seems to care. It all waned because the end product wasn’t worth arguing over. Those hoping for more from the extended cut? You’re left out too. The extra 20 minutes on the Blu-ray spill out admittedly slightly cleaner edits, but also obvious deleted scenes material and needless filler.

Read our full Ghostbusters review for more.

Video (UHD)

Although a slight magenta push to the flesh tones is noted in the first act, this problem quickly fades. In place is a natural, gorgeously rendered color spectrum. HDR effects add the needed sizzle to proton streams and ghostly auras. Even New York’s skyline comes alive, absolutely beautiful during the nighttime finale, despite a spire of ghostly material emanating from the center.

Finished at 2K, Ghostbusters isn’t a fidelity showcase, although the level of high frequency material in close or during city aerials earns merit. Strong, firm, consistent detail suffers only a handful of missteps, with faults levied on the original cinematography, not this transfer.

A few rounds with digital noise sit in the background. It’s generally inconsequential. Black levels handle shadows, avoiding many instances of crush while still hiding any other problem spots of noise. Vivid contrast is given life by this format with great control as to not blot out detail while keep depth high.

Video (Blu-ray)

Bright, saturated, and contrast-y, Sony’s Ghostbusters Blu-ray deserves to be demo material. It’s not. Instead, it’s a muddy, sometimes even murky presentation, replete with inexcusable problems. While the color adds zest to ghosts and proton streams, flesh tones succumb to an ungainly, radioactive-like neon. Watching Ghostbusters on Blu-ray compares to watching something on a TV in Best Buy’s demo room, with the tint a few notches off.

Sunlight blasts through windows and blots out any semblance of detail. Contrast runs hot, which is one descriptor. Retina burning is another. Some Sony-specific problems from last year with Interview and Fury return too. Black crush takes out shadows regularly. Shadows destroy the sense of natural depth, losing nuance for pockets of undefined darkness.

If those problems come down to post-production – although the theatrical presentation wasn’t near this gaudy – then fine. The Blu-ray still chokes on lackluster encoding. A bright red sweater worn by Wiig reveals artifacts. Orange stripes on the jumpsuits call to the compression, exposing further concerns. During some dimmer scenes, noise creeps in, swarming around the actresses.

On the better end, detail renders fairly well, if not hit by the above problems. Close-ups resolve definition and the ghosts – with their glowing designs – do pop from the screen. New York exteriors clean up well too, particularly when the ghosts begin their escape. Night doesn’t impact the city’s skyline.

On a final note is aspect ratio. Ghostbusters is among the strangest. 3D effects pop out of the faux 2.35:1 frame. That effect stays in the 2D presentation. However, the height of the frame (along with the use of those effects) varies in consistency. Sometimes height suggests 1.85:1; effects hit an invisible barrier. Elsewhere, they keep going past. During a key final scene, the matte opens fully for a minute or so, then back down to 2.35:1 for the epilogue. Weird.

Audio

Sony’s new trick? Holding the Atmos/7.1 mix to the 4K UHD disc only, then fitting the standard Blu-ray with a downsampled 5.1. Eww. The result is an inferior audio mix, and that’s clear without having access to the 4K release. While stereos wrap up the front soundstage, surrounds limp around, only used when absolutely necessary. When utilized, it’s fun. Proton streams swirl about, with ghost movement matching the on-screen effects. All of this surround activity sounds dimmed and less effective than needed though.

Dynamic range earns criticism too. Paranormal activity perks up the subwoofer, without cranking the low-end. When battling a ghost at a concert, the music hardly registers. The final chapter brings up a handful of decent strikes (giant ghost Rowan especially) but the major battle sequence becomes distracted without directionality. With some fantastic blockbuster audio mixes this year, Ghostsbusters isn’t near their league (at least in this configuration).

On the UHD, the rear speakers open up, swaying proton streams back and forth with fantastic energy. Low-end effects contain superb power, especially with those same streams. The ghostbusting equipment demands the necessary power.

Extras

Two commentaries on a new release is an unusual offering anymore. Paul Fieg and writer Kate Dippold come together on track one, with track two bringing back Fieg to chat with his various department heads. Two gag reels combine for 15 minutes of goofs, certainly lengthy. Apply the same, “this seems really long” mentality to the line-o-rama (labeled jokes-a-plenty), six parts forming together for 34-minutes. Four deleted scenes and 11 extended also breach the half hour mark when bundled.

A few EPKs jump into action with Meet the Team and Chris Hemsworth is Kevin. The Ghosts of Ghostbusters nears that EPK level too, but has some insight into the design process. Throwing back to the original film is Visual Effects 30 Years Later, spending 15-minutes to discuss industry progression and Fieg’s slight aversion to CG, even if the wealth of green screens in these features says otherwise. A five minute peek into the process of creating slime is funny, closing out the video end of the bonuses with a photo gallery left standing.

  • Ghostbusters (2016)
  • Video (UHD)
  • Video (Blu-ray)
  • Audio (UHD)
  • Audio (Blu-ray)
  • Extras

Summary

Simple, baffling, and wasteful, the 2016 Ghostbusters reboot falls apart under any scrutiny while on the hunt for nostalgia.

Sending

User Review

1(1 vote)

Click on the images below for full resolution screen captures taken directly from the Blu-ray. Images have not been altered in any way during the process. Patreon supporters were able to access these screens early, view them as .pngs, and gain access to exclusives.











4k7.1Bill MurrayBlu-Raychris hemsworthdolby atmosDTS-HD Master AudioGhostbusterskate mckinnonkristen wiigleslie jonesmelissa mccarthysonyuhd

Ghostbusters (2016) UHD Blu-ray Review (2024)

FAQs

Why was Ghostbusters 2016 controversial? ›

Controversy. Ghostbusters received criticism on social media following word of Feig's involvement and the all-female cast, which some felt was a "gimmick".

Is Ghostbusters 4K worth it? ›

This Ultra HD Blu-ray arrives with a strong 4K video presentation. Though the picture quality isn't a massive jump from its Blu-ray counterpart, it offers several noteworthy improvements that should please fans.

Is Ghostbusters 2016 worth watching? ›

The Ghostbusters reboot was exactly the kind of lighthearted fun I want in a summer flick. I really enjoyed it and have seen a number of posts on Facebook from friends both male and female who saw it and really liked it, too. There were so many laugh out loud funny moments.

Did Ghostbusters 2016 make a profit? ›

Ghostbusters: Answer the Call (2016) LOST money. It cost $144 million to produce, but with all the marketing, ads, hype, etc it was estimated they would need to earn around $300 million to break even.

Was Ghostbusters 2016 a failure? ›

That contributed to a box-office bomb, with the film grossing only $222.9 million, marking a $70 million loss (via Box Office Mojo). The film's failures led many to believe the franchise was officially dead but it has come back in strong fashion.

Why wasn t Rick Moranis in Ghostbusters 2016? ›

The actor has rarely been on screen since the 2000s. However, that almost changed when he was approached to do a brief cameo in 2016's Ghostbusters starring Melissa McCarthy. However, the actor had no interest in reprising the role in the film because it made no sense to him.

Which Ghostbusters is the best? ›

Ghostbusters Movies Ranked by Tomatometer
  • #1. Ghostbusters. 95% #1. ...
  • #2. Ghostbusters. 74% #2. ...
  • #3. Ghostbusters: Afterlife. 64% #3. ...
  • #4. Ghostbusters II. 55% #4. ...
  • #5. Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire. 42% #5.

Are 4K Ultra HD movies worth it? ›

It allows compatible TVs to display extremely bright and dark black picture content together within the same image. Ultra HD Blu-ray movies with HDR are the current gold standard for picture quality. Ultra HD Blu-ray movies with HDR can really pop on a 4K TV screen.

Is 4K really that much better? ›

4K displays have a far greater resolution than 1080p displays. This means images and videos appear more detailed and clearer. With more pixels, you can experience much better color transitions and gradients, making images more realistic.

Is Ghostbusters Afterlife better than Ghostbusters 2016? ›

Ghostbusters: Afterlife relies heavily on nostalgia, packed with Easter eggs and cameos. The film strays from the original's comedic horror roots, shifts focus to family and drama. Ghostbusters: Answer the Call is a better reboot, highlighting fun and comedy elements.

Is Ghostbusters 2016 and 2021 connected? ›

Will this be a sequel to the 2016 'Ghostbusters' film? No. This is a sequel to Ghostbusters (1984) and Ghostbusters II (1989). Furthermore, in the trailer, Paul Rudd says "There hasn't been a ghost sighting in 30 years", implying that the events occurring in the 2016 movie never happened in this film's timeline.

Is Ghostbusters 2016 a parody? ›

Ghostbusters (2016 Movie) (also known as Ghostbusters: Answer The Call) is a movie directed and co-written by Paul Feig that restarts the franchise with a reimagined origin story featuring a team of female Ghostbusters.

How much did Bill Murray get paid for Ghostbusters? ›

According to Celebrity Net Worth, Murray earned around earned approximately $125 million from the first two Ghostbusters movies plus a $15 million payment for his appearance in Ghostbusters Afterlife - more than double the fee he received for Scrooged.

Why did Ghostbusters: Afterlife flop? ›

The film received mixed reviews from critics, with praise for the cast's performances, Reitman's direction, nostalgic tone, and its respectful tribute to Ramis, with criticism mostly being directed towards its screenplay and fan service. It grossed $204 million worldwide against a production budget of $75 million.

What Ghostbuster movie made the most money? ›

Key:Estimated
RankReleaseLifetime Gross
1Ghostbusters$229,242,989
2Ghostbusters: Afterlife$129,360,575
3Ghostbusters$128,350,574
4Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire$113,306,664
6 more rows

Why is Ghostbusters inappropriate? ›

Because of its scary scenes, scary characters, coarse language and sexual references, Ghostbusters: Afterlife is best suited to families with children over 12 years. Also, we recommend parental guidance for children aged 10-12 years.

Why do critics hate Ghostbusters afterlife? ›

No matter the content of Afterlife, critics were always going to hate it because they saw it as being made for a fan base they tried to cancel. Phoebe Spengler is more of a Ghostbuster than any of the hacks in the 2016 movie will ever be.

Why would the Ghostbusters be seen as frauds? ›

So the Ghostbusters are considered frauds in their belief in ghosts and the populace believes that ghosts don't exist. Even though all of New York saw what went down during The Ghostbuster's encounter with Gozer and the appearance of The Destructor.

Does Ghostbusters Afterlife ignore Ghostbusters 2016? ›

The film would feature teenagers—two males and two females—as the recruits for the Ghostbusters team. Jason Reitman said the film ignores the events of 2016's Ghostbusters reboot, which was directed by Paul Feig. Reitman said he did not mean to snub the 2016 film and that he had "nothing but admiration" for Feig.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Virgilio Hermann JD

Last Updated:

Views: 6261

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Virgilio Hermann JD

Birthday: 1997-12-21

Address: 6946 Schoen Cove, Sipesshire, MO 55944

Phone: +3763365785260

Job: Accounting Engineer

Hobby: Web surfing, Rafting, Dowsing, Stand-up comedy, Ghost hunting, Swimming, Amateur radio

Introduction: My name is Virgilio Hermann JD, I am a fine, gifted, beautiful, encouraging, kind, talented, zealous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.